Result
| Fin | PP | Horse | Jockey / Trainer | start | 1/4 | 1/2 | stretch | finish | Margin | Odds | Fig |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | Mr. Big Shot 3wd, edged away lane | Jake Olesiak | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | — | 1.20 | 13A E1 84 · LP 105 |
| 2 | 4 | Big Bend Buckaroo 4wd rally, gain 2nd | Adrian Ramos | 4 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3½ | 5.40 | 3A E1 71 · LP 103 |
| 3 | 2 | Prince B 3-4wd, bid turn, empty | Zack Ziegler | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 13.60 | 4A E1 77 · LP 99 |
| 4 | 6 | Chief Ty He no rally 3wd | Scott Bethke | 6 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 4.60 | 23A E1 75 · LP 100 |
| 5 | 7 | Alex To no threat 4wd | Mike Luark | 7 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 7¼ | 7.40 | 40A E1 66 · LP 99 |
| 6 | 5 | P R Why Not tuck insd, weakened | John Jude | 1 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 10¾ | 7.40 | 4A E1 74 · LP 94 |
| 7 | 1 | P R Girlfriend vied 2path, tired | Nathan Haar | 3 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 11¾ | 6.10 | 32A E1 84 · LP 88 |
How the race unfolded (position at each call; hover a line to follow one runner)
Fractional times
Call 124.20
Call 248.60
Call 31:01.80
Final1:14.60
Payouts
| Bet | Winning numbers | Paid | Pool |
|---|---|---|---|
| win ($2) | 3 | $4.40 | — |
| place ($2) | 3 | $3 | — |
| show ($2) | 3 | $2.60 | — |
| exacta ($1) | 3-4 | $10.80 | $5,053 |
| place ($2) | 4 | $6.40 | — |
| show ($2) | 4 | $3.80 | — |
| trifecta ($0.50) | 3-4-2 | $52.25 | $3,973 |
| show ($2) | 2 | $4.20 | — |
| superfecta ($0.10) | 3-4-2-6 | $30.56 | $1,630 |
| daily double ($1) | 5-3 | $18.40 | $1,227 |
| Pick 3 ($1) | 5-5-3 | $139.10 | $1,113 |
Chart notes
MR. BIG SHOT was on the pace three wide outside a rival early, edged clear staying out from the rail and shook off a challenge from PRINCE B through the far turn and edged away late. BIG BEND BUCKAROO rallied four wide to reach contention in the far turn, continued on to gain the place in the drive but could not threaten the winner. PRINCE B angled out going up the backstretch to bid outside the winner in the far turn but came up empty in the drive. CHIEF TY HE failed to mount a rally three wide. ALEX TO was not a threat four wide. P R WHY NOT tucked inside going to the first turn and weakened. P R GIRLFRIEND contested the early lead about the two path inside the winner and tired.