Hawthorne · Thursday, July 25, 2024 · Race 1 of 9

Claiming

dirt, fastSix FurlongsPurse $13,5005 ranPost 2024-07-25 14:14:00Final time 1:13.08Pool $25,690

Good for all except 3

Result

FinPPHorseJockey / Trainerstart1/41/2stretchfinishMarginOddsFig
16Freedom Attack
bmp,offpc,3wsurge,clrd
Victor Santiago23321—25.1024B
E1 121 · LP 94
22Problematica
brkout,brsh,led,denied
Omar Hernandez Moreno1111233.9051B
E1 131 · LP 77
35Quiero Dinero
bmp,bobble,ltrailbid
Frank Reyes444334¼3.4047B
E1 108 · LP 90
43Resolution
bmp,stmbld,ltgnshow
Luis Colon555544¼3.5039B
E1 102 · LP 96
51Highwood
chased, tired stretch
Jareth Loveberry3224510¼1.2040B
E1 122 · LP 72

How the race unfolded (position at each call; hover a line to follow one runner)

12345start1/41/2stretchfinish2Problematica5Quiero Dinero3Resolution1Highwood6Freedom Attack

Fractional times

Call 121.61
Call 244.91
Call 358.26
Final1:13.08

Payouts

BetWinning numbersPaidPool
win ($2)6$2.20—
place ($2)6$15.40—
show ($2)6$6.40—
exacta ($1)6-2$113.70$14,751
place ($2)2$5.60—
show ($2)2$4.20—
trifecta ($0.50)6-2-5$236.20$9,514
show ($2)5$3—
superfecta ($0.20)6-2-5-3$197.58$6,423

Chart notes

FREEDOM ATTACK bumped with QUIERO DINERO leaving the gate then raced off the pace from off the rail to mid stretch and made a late three wide surge to draw clear in the final yards. PROBLEMATICA broke outward leaving the gate and brushed with RESOLUTION then sprinted to a clear lead but was caught in the final yards. QUIERO DINERO bumped with RESOLUTION and FREEDOM ATTACK leaving the gate and bobbled slightly, raced near the back through the turn while saving ground and made a late rail bid to be up for the show. RESOLUTION bumped with QUIERO DINERO and was brushed by PROBLEMATICA then stumbled slightly, she trailed the field to deep stretch but made a late gain for the show. HIGHWOOD chased the leader to eighth pole and tired. A JOCKEY OBJECTION WAS POSTED, THE JOCKEY OF RESOLUTION CLAIMED FOUL AGAINST THE JOCKEY OF PROBLEMATICA FOR ALLEGED INTERFERENCE AT THE START, AFTER A STEWARD REVIEW THERE WAS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO ALLOW THE CLAIM OF FOUL, SO NO ACTION WAS TAKEN.